Gurdjieff Foundation Of California
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Expenses | Net | Reserve mo. | Staff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 259,379 | 325,352 | −65,973 | 106.5 | 0% |
| 2012 | 256,851 | 308,606 | −51,755 | 110.3 | 0% |
| 2013 | 305,929 | 317,376 | −11,447 | 106.8 | 0% |
| 2014 | 337,936 | 319,497 | 18,439 | 106.8 | 0% |
| 2015 | 318,837 | 324,109 | −5,272 | 105.1 | 0% |
| 2016 | 329,992 | 369,966 | −39,974 | 90.8 | 0% |
| 2017 | 404,144 | 368,148 | 35,996 | 92.4 | 0% |
| 2018 | 363,675 | 357,291 | 6,384 | 95.4 | 0% |
| 2019 | 366,397 | 372,781 | −6,384 | 91.2 | 0% |
| 2020 | 666,781 | 306,858 | 359,923 | 124.9 | 0% |
| 2021 | 218,895 | 279,505 | −60,610 | 134.5 | 0% |
| 2022 | 225,386 | 320,969 | −95,583 | 113.6 | 0% |
| 2023 | 313,592 | 357,333 | −43,741 | 100.6 | 0% |
In its most recent public year (2023), this organization spent $43,741 more than it brought in. Its reserves stood at about 100.6 months of spending, down from 106.5 in 2011. Staff pay was 0% of spending.
Reserve months = net assets ÷ average monthly spending; net assets count everything the organization owns beyond its debts — buildings and donor-restricted funds included, not just cash. Staff pay = salaries, wages, and officer compensation; it excludes benefits and payroll taxes. The IRS releases this data years after the fact — this organization's newest public year is 2023. Years refer to the calendar year in which the organization's fiscal year ended. Short-form filers do not publicly report donor-restricted balances or staffing costs. Source filings
Gurdjieff Foundation Of California's IRS filings as a feed — one entry per filing year, through 2023. Add the address to any feed reader; in Slack, send /feed subscribe with it (pasting the link alone won't subscribe). How this feed works