Uma Institute For Tibetan Studies
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Expenses | Net | Reserve mo. | Staff % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 145,954 | 66,253 | 79,701 | 14.4 | — |
| 2012 | 175,315 | 149,186 | 26,129 | 8.5 | — |
| 2013 | 200,549 | 153,284 | 47,265 | 12.0 | 48% |
| 2014 | 241,877 | 177,171 | 64,706 | 14.8 | 58% |
| 2015 | 232,969 | 191,133 | 41,836 | 16.3 | 54% |
| 2016 | 50,309 | 159,111 | −108,802 | 11.4 | 56% |
| 2017 | 132,771 | 151,408 | −18,637 | 10.5 | 62% |
| 2018 | 55,784 | 140,548 | −84,764 | 4.0 | 55% |
| 2019 | 59,304 | 87,842 | −28,538 | 2.6 | 46% |
| 2020 | 65,298 | 63,723 | 1,575 | 3.9 | — |
| 2021 | 51,568 | 50,529 | 1,039 | 5.1 | — |
| 2022 | 14,508 | 35,742 | −21,234 | 0.1 | — |
| 2023 | 128,767 | 21,190 | 107,577 | 61.1 | — |
In its most recent public year (2023), this organization brought in $107,577 more than it spent. Its reserves stood at about 61.1 months of spending, up from 14.4 in 2011.
Reserve months = net assets ÷ average monthly spending; net assets count everything the organization owns beyond its debts — buildings and donor-restricted funds included, not just cash. Staff pay = salaries, wages, and officer compensation; it excludes benefits and payroll taxes. The IRS releases this data years after the fact — this organization's newest public year is 2023. Years refer to the calendar year in which the organization's fiscal year ended. Short-form filers do not publicly report donor-restricted balances or staffing costs. Source filings
Uma Institute For Tibetan Studies's IRS filings as a feed — one entry per filing year, through 2023. Add the address to any feed reader; in Slack, send /feed subscribe with it (pasting the link alone won't subscribe). How this feed works